Facilitating the propagation of spiking activity in feedforward networks by including feedback
- PMID: 32776924
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008033
Facilitating the propagation of spiking activity in feedforward networks by including feedback
Abstract
Transient oscillations in network activity upon sensory stimulation have been reported in different sensory areas of the brain. These evoked oscillations are the generic response of networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons (EI-networks) to a transient external input. Recently, it has been shown that this resonance property of EI-networks can be exploited for communication in modular neuronal networks by enabling the transmission of sequences of synchronous spike volleys ('pulse packets'), despite the sparse and weak connectivity between the modules. The condition for successful transmission is that the pulse packet (PP) intervals match the period of the modules' resonance frequency. Hence, the mechanism was termed communication through resonance (CTR). This mechanism has three severe constraints, though. First, it needs periodic trains of PPs, whereas single PPs fail to propagate. Second, the inter-PP interval needs to match the network resonance. Third, transmission is very slow, because in each module, the network resonance needs to build up over multiple oscillation cycles. Here, we show that, by adding appropriate feedback connections to the network, the CTR mechanism can be improved and the aforementioned constraints relaxed. Specifically, we show that adding feedback connections between two upstream modules, called the resonance pair, in an otherwise feedforward modular network can support successful propagation of a single PP throughout the entire network. The key condition for successful transmission is that the sum of the forward and backward delays in the resonance pair matches the resonance frequency of the network modules. The transmission is much faster, by more than a factor of two, than in the original CTR mechanism. Moreover, it distinctly lowers the threshold for successful communication by synchronous spiking in modular networks of weakly coupled networks. Thus, our results suggest a new functional role of bidirectional connectivity for the communication in cortical area networks.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Communication through resonance in spiking neuronal networks.PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Aug 28;10(8):e1003811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003811. eCollection 2014 Aug. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014. PMID: 25165853 Free PMC article.
-
Propagation of synchronous spiking activity in feedforward neural networks.J Physiol Paris. 1996;90(3-4):243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0928-4257(97)81432-5. J Physiol Paris. 1996. PMID: 9116676 Review.
-
Pulvinar thalamic nucleus allows for asynchronous spike propagation through the cortex.Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 May 19;9:60. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00060. eCollection 2015. Front Comput Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26042026 Free PMC article.
-
Oscillatorylike behavior in feedforward neuronal networks.Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Jul;92(1):012703. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012703. Epub 2015 Jul 6. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015. PMID: 26274199
-
Spiking activity propagation in neuronal networks: reconciling different perspectives on neural coding.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Sep;11(9):615-27. doi: 10.1038/nrn2886. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20725095 Review.