Advanced Search

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Figures

Figure 1

Mean afterdischarge threshold (ADT) in the different groups before and after one week of stimulation on two (2C) or four (4C) contacts. In the LFS4C group, Post1, Post2 and Post3 values were statistically significantly higher than the mean of Pre values (red star) (p = 0.023 for the three comparisons). The other groups showed no significant differences. Data in μA + 1 standard error.

Figure 2

Mean afterdischarge duration (ADD) in the different groups before and after one week of stimulation on two (2C) or four contacts (4C). The HFS4C group showed a statistically significant decrease in ADD comparing values before and after stimulation (red star), with Post2 being shorter than the mean of Pre values (p = 0.02). No significant changes in ADD were observed in the other groups. Data in seconds + 1 standard error.

Figure 3

Representative LFP recording of two afterdischarges (AD) from a rat in the HFS-4C group, a Pre-SP (up) and a Post-SP (down) stimulation session. This case illustrates the AD duration decrease observed after one week of desynchronizing HFS. Black arrows indicate the AD end. Scale bars in mV and seconds.

Highlights

  • Four-contact desynchronizing LFS consistently increased AD threshold for a period of 2 days to 2 weeks.
  • Four-contact desynchronizing HFS significantly decreased AD duration 24 hours following the stimulation period.
  • No behavioral seizure alteration occurred in any stimulated group.

    Summary

    Background

    Low- and high-frequency stimulation (LFS and HFS, respectively) have been, reported to modify seizure characteristics in rats. We here report effects of hippocampal LFS and HFS, applied at two or four sites in fully kindled rats.

    Methods

    Rats were kindled through a hippocampal tetrode until the fully kindled state. Animals with, stable afterdischarge (AD) threshold were randomly assigned to 5 groups; stimulation at 1 Hz (LFS) or, 130 Hz (HFS) was continuously applied for 7 days at 2 or 4 intrahippocampal sites; a control, group received no stimulation. Four-contact stimulation was performed in a rotating fashion. Stimulation effects on AD threshold, AD duration and behavioral seizures were assessed.

    Key findings

    : Four-contact LFS consistently increased AD threshold for a period of 2 days to 2 weeks, whereas 4-contact HFS significantly decreased AD duration 24 hours following the stimulation period. No significant AD modification was observed with either 2-contact stimulation paradigms. No, behavioral alteration occurred in any group.

    Significance

    : These findings suggest that effects of hippocampal stimulation depend on frequency and topography of stimulus application. LFS and HFS had anti-epileptic effect on afterdischarges when applied in a rotating pattern. This supports concepts on patterned stimulation to result in desynchronization and anti-kindling effects.

    To access this article, please choose from the options below

    Log In




    Forgot password?

    Register

    Create a new account

    Purchase access to this article

    You must be logged in to purchase this article.

    Claim Access

    If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

    Subscribe to this title

    Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

    Institutional Access

    Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

    Related Articles
    Ajay K. Srivastava, H. Steve White
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.10.003
    Epilepsy Research, Vol. 104, Issues 1-2
    Yan-Feng Zhang, Shu-Lei Li, Tian-Qing Xiong, Li-Bin Yang, Yong-Nan Li, Bai-Hong Tan, Qun Liu, Yan-Chao li
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.10.019
    Epilepsy Research, Vol. 108, Issue 1
    Víctor Manuel Magdaleno-Madrigal, Alejandro Valdés-Cruz, David Martínez-Vargas, Salvador Almazán-Alvarado, Rodrigo Fernández-Mas
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.10.012
    Epilepsy Research, Vol. 108, Issue 1
    View All