Click here to find out more!

Article Information

PubMed

Related Articles

  • more
Click here to find out more!

Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Current Biology, Volume 19, Issue 4, 352-357, 12 February 2009

doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.036

Report


Motor Task Variation Induces Structural Learning

Daniel A. Braun1,2,3,4,Go To Corresponding Author,,Ad Aertsen2,4,Daniel M. Wolpert1andCarsten Mehring2,3

1 Computational and Biological Learning Lab, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
2 Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Albert Ludwigs University, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
3 Institute of Biology I, Albert Ludwigs University, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
4 Institute of Biology III, Albert Ludwigs University, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany

Corresponding author


Summary

When we have learned a motor skill, such as cycling or ice-skating, we can rapidly generalize to novel tasks, such as motorcycling or rollerblading [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Such facilitation of learning could arise through two distinct mechanisms by which the motor system might adjust its control parameters. First, fast learning could simply be a consequence of the proximity of the original and final settings of the control parameters. Second, by structural learning [9,10,11,12,13,14], the motor system could constrain the parameter adjustments to conform to the control parameters' covariance structure. Thus, facilitation of learning would rely on the novel task parameters' lying on the structure of a lower-dimensional subspace that can be explored more efficiently. To test between these two hypotheses, we exposed subjects to randomly varying visuomotor tasks of fixed structure. Although such randomly varying tasks are thought to prevent learning, we show that when subsequently presented with novel tasks, subjects exhibit three key features of structural learning: facilitated learning of tasks with the same structure, strong reduction in interference normally observed when switching between tasks that require opposite control strategies, and preferential exploration along the learned structure. These results suggest that skill generalization relies on task variation and structural learning.