Entrez PubMed Nucleotide Protein Genome Structure OMIM PMC Journals Books
 Search for
  Limits  Preview/Index  History  Clipboard  Details     
About Entrez

Text Version

Entrez PubMed
Help | FAQ

PubMed Services
Journals Database
MeSH Database
Single Citation Matcher
Batch Citation Matcher
Clinical Queries

Related Resources
Order Documents
NLM Catalog
NLM Gateway
Consumer Health
Clinical Alerts
PubMed Central
1: Neural Comput. 2002 Jan;14(1):121-53. Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
Statistical significance of coincident spikes: count-based versus rate-based statistics.

Gutig R, Aertsen A, Rotter S.

Neurobiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biology III, Albert-Ludwigs-University, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.

Inspired by different conceptualizations of temporal neural coding schemes, there has been recent interest in the search for signs of precisely synchronized neural activity in the cortex. One method developed for this task is unitary-event analysis. This method tests multiple single neuron recordings for short epochs with significantly more coincident spikes than expected from independent neurons. We reformulated the statistical test underlying this method using a coincidence count distribution based on empirical spike counts rather than on estimated spike probabilities. In the case of two neurons, the requirement of stationary firing rates, originally imposed on both neurons, can be relaxed; only the rate of one neuron needs to be stationary, while the other may follow an arbitrary time course. By analytical calculations of the test power curves of the original and the revised method, we demonstrate that the test power can be increased by a factor of two or more in physiologically realistic regimes. In addition, we analyze the effective significance levels of both methods for neural firing rates ranging between 0.2 Hz and 30 Hz.

PMID: 11747536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]